Use cases · Inbox · Weekdays at 8:00 AM

Every teammate has its own inbox, and outreach that earns replies

Cold email fails when it reads cold. Lists get scraped, first lines get templated, and follow-ups stop after one try because a human got busy.

This is where per-agent inboxes matter. Every Squad teammate has its own real email address with its own sending history. One teammate runs a careful sequence from one address. Add teammates and each runs its own lane from its own inbox, so volume grows without one address carrying everything.

Before each send, the teammate researches the prospect with its search tools and its own browser: their site, their recent posts, what they ship. The first line is about them because the teammate actually looked. Replies come back to the same inbox, and the interested ones become flagged tickets in your queue.

How it runs
01
Define the target in plain words

Who you sell to and why they care. The teammate builds the list with its research tools and enriches every row before anything sends.

02
Approve the sequence once

First touch, two follow-ups, a close. Edit the drafts in the ticket; the voice you leave is the voice every send keeps. The squad's Voice file holds the rules.

03
It researches, then writes

Before each email the teammate reads the prospect's site in its own browser and checks recent activity with AI Search. No research, no send.

04
Sends go from its own address

A real inbox with a real thread history and a daily cap you set. Bounces and unsubscribes are honored instantly and logged. More volume = more teammates, each with its own inbox and cap.

05
Follow-ups never get forgotten

The sequence runs on the schedule, per prospect. A reply stops the sequence for that thread the moment it arrives.

06
Interested replies reach you hot

A positive reply becomes a ticket with the thread, the research, and a suggested next step. The lead lands in HubSpot enriched. You take the call; the teammate books it.

What lands on your desk
A first touch, after the research
From: Miles <miles@yourcompany.squad.so>
To: priit@ferrostack.io
Subject: your Kubernetes cost post

Hi Priit,

Your post on cutting Ferrostack's cluster bill by 40% made the
rounds here. The part about idle staging nodes is exactly the
problem we solve for teams your size — automatically, not with
a spreadsheet review every quarter.

Worth 15 minutes next week? If not, the post was still great.

Miles
What you get
  • A researched first line on every email, verified by the run log.
  • Volume that scales by adding teammates, each with its own inbox.
  • Follow-ups that run themselves and stop on reply.
  • Hot replies flagged to you with the full context attached.
Works with
GmailHubSpotLinkedIn

Your teammate connects through the integrations you approve, works on its own computer with its own browser, and asks you before anything irreversible.

Your first month
Day 0

You describe the target and approve the sequence. The teammate builds the first list overnight.

Day 1

Ten researched drafts wait as tickets. You read the first lines: they cite real posts and real pages. You approve eight.

Week 1

First replies thread back to the teammate's inbox. Two are interested; both reach you as flagged tickets with the research attached.

Month 1

You add a second teammate for a second segment — its own inbox, its own cap, its own lane. Volume doubles; quality does not drop.

Squads also run